With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the. Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement.
Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement.
With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the. Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank.
Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank.
With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the.
Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement.
Ariel Sharon Israel : The Temple Mount - Opinion - Jerusalem Post - In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement.. In israel, it has been criticized by the settlers themselves, supported by the israeli right, who saw ariel sharon's action as a betrayal of his previous policies of support of settlement. With ehud olmert as party chairman following sharon's stroke, it became the. Conversely, the disengagement has been criticized by parts of the israeli left, who viewed it as nothing more than a mode of stalling negotiations and increasing israeli presence in the west bank.